Compare Takeoff Software
Togal.AI vs Bluebeam for Construction Takeoffs
Bluebeam Revu is a PDF markup and document platform that estimators have adapted for takeoff, and Max adds AI with smart tools with an additional subscription. Togal is purpose-built for takeoff, so the AI reads your drawings and returns the quantities you bid from. Here's how the two compare on takeoff automation, collaboration, device support, pricing, and support.
Teams who switched from Bluebeam to Togal



The numbers behind Togal
Average support response
A flooring contractor finished a two-week takeoff, caught an error for the GC, and won the job
Faster takeoffs
To a new user's first completed takeoff
Certified, plans stay walled off
Average support response
A flooring contractor finished a two-week takeoff, caught an error for the GC, and won the job
Faster takeoffs
To a new user's first completed takeoff
Certified, plans stay walled off
NC Painting went from 19 bids a month on Bluebeam to 60 bids a month on Togal, with the same team.
Which takeoff tool is right for you
Book a DemoChoose Togal if:
Takeoff is the job, and you want every feature in the product pointed at getting quantities out of a drawing.
You want AI measuring included in your subscription instead of being unlocked by a premium tier.
You want to “talk to your plans” with an AI-native CHAT instead of buying a separate Claude-powered assistant in addition to your Bluebeam Max subscription.
Your bid volume is the number you are trying to move, not your document turnaround.
Your estimators work on Mac, iPads, and anything that opens a browser.
Colour-coded classifications need to stay readable across a dense plan set.
- You want exports that arrive organised, filtered, and grouped rather than sorted by hand afterwards.
Choose Bluebeam if:
Marking up, redlining, and managing PDFs is the larger part of your day.
Your RFI, submittal, and document review workflows already run through Studio.
Your team is Windows-based and the whole company is standardised on Revu.
Occasional measuring inside a document tool covers what you need.
Budget is the deciding factor and takeoff time is not currently costing you bids.
Togal.AI vs Bluebeam at a glance
Book a DemoWhat each platform does well
Togal.AI strengths
Every feature aimed at quantity extraction, so estimators skip the document-management busy work
AI measuring included in the subscription rather than gated behind a premium tier
Runs on any device and any operating system, Mac and iPad included
Automatic file naming and organisation across an entire plan set
A wide colour range that keeps classifications legible on dense drawings
Bluebeam strengths
The deepest PDF markup toolset in construction, built over two decades
Studio sessions for real-time document review with colour-coded markups
Strong document management for redlining, RFIs, and submittals
Near-universal adoption, so most estimators have already used it
Stitching combines multiple drawing sheets into a single navigable view
Key difference: a takeoff tool, not a document tool that measures
Togal.AI
Togal was built for quantity extraction. The AI reads the drawing, classifies what is on it, and returns areas, linears, and counts ready to export. Nothing in the product exists to manage submittals or route an RFI, which is exactly why the takeoff comes out faster.
Bluebeam
Bluebeam earns its position by making PDF markup better than paper. Measurement came along as one tool in a large box, useful for a quick area check, and plenty of estimators have built a takeoff habit around it. The product is still organised around documents, so getting bid-ready quantities means driving a review tool toward a job it was not shaped for.
Five reasons estimators move from Bluebeam to Togal
Automation instead of clicks.

AI trained on construction drawings.

One fee, no feature caps.

Any device your estimators actually use.

Exports that arrive ready.

When to stay on Bluebeam
Bluebeam is the best PDF markup tool in construction, and that is not a small thing. If your day is redlining drawings, running submittals, and keeping document versions straight, Revu does work Togal does not cover.
If your takeoffs are occasional and your bid volume is fine, Bluebeam is a reasonable place to stay. The case for Togal rests on what your hours are worth: at 20 hours a week on takeoffs, halving that frees up roughly 500 hours a year per estimator.
Togal.AI vs Bluebeam: common questions
Upload a plan set and watch Togal detect, measure, and count it. Takeoff in Minutes. Not Days.





